Toyota Hilux 2012 vs Ford Ranger 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 | 2.2 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 - 171 HP | 150 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 - 360 NM | 375 - 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 13.3 seconds | 10.3 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 8.6 | 8.5 - 10.4 | |
|
On average, Toyota Hilux equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.26 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Toyota Hilux is smaller, but higher. Toyota Hilux is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Hilux is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 900 litres | 1210 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage space. Toyota Hilux has 310 litres less trunk space than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Hilux is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Toyota Hilux can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`717 | ~ 1`123 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 20 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Hilux has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |