Toyota Celica 1995 vs Ford Escort 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 70 HP more power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Ford Escort. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.1 | |
|
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Celica consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Escort gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.33 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger, but lower. Toyota Celica is 36 cm longer than the Ford Escort, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1 metres more than that of the Ford Escort, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Ford Escort has
| |