Toyota Celica 1990 vs Ford Probe 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 86 HP more power than Ford Probe, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Ford Probe. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.8 | |
|
The Ford Probe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Celica consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller. Toyota Celica is 16 cm shorter than the Ford Probe, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Probe. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Ford Probe has
| |