Toyota Celica 1990 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 98 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 125 NM more than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.2 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 6 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda 323 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger, but lower. Toyota Celica is 43 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 309 litres | |
| Toyota Celica has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |