Toyota Celica 1990 vs Honda Prelude 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 NM | 179 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 71 HP more power than Honda Prelude, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Honda Prelude. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.6 | |
|
The Honda Prelude is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Celica consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.29 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Celica is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Prelude, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda Prelude has
| |