Toyota Celica 2002 vs Honda Civic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 72 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Honda Civic. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Civic engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Corolla | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.40 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 9 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 441 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda Civic has
| |