Toyota Celica 2002 vs Chrysler Sebring 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Toyota Celica engine produces 11 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 98 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Despite less power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller. Toyota Celica is 48 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |