Toyota Celica 2002 vs Audi TT 1998

 
Toyota Celica
2002 - 2005
Audi TT
1998 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 192 HP225 HP
Torque: 180 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.4 seconds6.6 seconds
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving.
Toyota Celica engine produces 33 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.49.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.6 l/100km9.9 l/100km
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Toyota Celica consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway870 km on highway
630 km with real consumption620 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.35 m4.04 m
Width: 1.74 m1.76 m
Height: 1.32 m1.34 m
Toyota Celica is 31 cm longer than the Audi TT, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data220 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`850
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 24004400
Pros and Cons: Toyota Celica has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv