Toyota Celica 1995 vs Toyota Celica 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 143 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 170 - 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.7 - 8.4 | |
|
Toyota Celica 1995 petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.33 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Toyota Celica 1995 is larger. Toyota Celica 1995 is 15 cm longer than the Toyota Celica 2002, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica 1995 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica 1995 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica 2002, which means Toyota Celica 1995 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Celica has
| |