Toyota Celica 1999 vs Nissan 200 SX 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Nissan 200 SX has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Toyota Celica is available with front wheel drive, while Nissan 200 SX can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 192 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 - 180 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.4 | 8.8 - 8.9 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 18 cm shorter than the Nissan 200 SX, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 307 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |