Toyota Celica 1999 vs Honda Prelude 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Honda Prelude has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 192 HP | 133 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 - 180 NM | 179 - 211 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | 7.5 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.4 | 9.2 - 10.4 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Prelude. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller. Toyota Celica is 20 cm shorter than the Honda Prelude, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda Prelude, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda Prelude has
| |