Toyota Celica 2002 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 192 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 180 NM | 177 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.4 | 9.7 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Eclipse. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Celica is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Celica is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 241 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Eclipse, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |