Toyota Carina E 1992 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Picnic is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Carina E engine produces 17 HP less power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 73 NM less than Toyota Picnic. Due to the lower power, Toyota Carina E reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Carina E consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Toyota Carina E over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Carina E consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.62 m | |
| Toyota Carina E and Toyota Picnic are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
|
Toyota Carina E has more luggage capacity. Toyota Carina E has 290 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Carina E is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Toyota Carina E can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Carina E has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Carina E has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |