Toyota Carina E 1992 vs Honda Accord 1995
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Carina E is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Carina E engine produces 22 HP more power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Honda Accord. Thanks to more power Toyota Carina E reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Carina E consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Toyota Carina E over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Carina E consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Celica | Used also on Honda CR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Carina E might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Toyota Carina E is smaller. Toyota Carina E is 24 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Carina E is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 739 litres | |
|
Toyota Carina E has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Carina E has 40 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. The Honda Accord may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Carina E is 0.3 metres less than that of the Honda Accord. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Toyota Carina E has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Toyota Carina E, so Toyota Carina E quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Carina E has
|
| |