Toyota Carina E 1992 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Carina E is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Carina E engine produces 5 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Thanks to more power Toyota Carina E reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Carina E consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Toyota Carina E over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Carina E consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 17 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.62 m | |
| Toyota Carina E and Toyota Picnic are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Toyota Carina E has 290 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 590 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Carina E is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Toyota Carina E can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Carina E has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Carina E has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |