Toyota Carina E 1995 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Picnic is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Carina E engine produces 21 HP less power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Toyota Picnic. Due to the lower power, Toyota Carina E reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Carina E consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Toyota Carina E over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Carina E consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Celica | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Hiace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Picnic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.62 m | |
| Toyota Carina E and Toyota Picnic are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Toyota Carina E has 290 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 1030 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Carina E is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Toyota Carina E can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Carina E has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Carina E has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |