Toyota Carina E 1992 vs Toyota Starlet 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 - 175 HP | 54 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 - 186 NM | 91 - 103 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 16.4 seconds | 10.3 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 8.5 | 4.8 - 7.4 | |
|
Toyota Carina E petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Starlet. On average, Toyota Carina E equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Starlet. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Toyota Carina E is larger. Toyota Carina E is 81 cm longer than the Toyota Starlet, 10 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Carina E is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Carina E is 1.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Starlet, which means Toyota Carina E can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`684 | ~ 800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Starlet has
| |