Toyota Carina E 1992 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 - 175 HP | 90 - 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 - 186 NM | 178 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 16.4 seconds | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 8.5 | 7.7 - 9.5 | |
|
Toyota Carina E petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Picnic. On average, Toyota Carina E equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.62 m | |
| Toyota Carina E and Toyota Picnic are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Toyota Carina E has 290 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 590 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Carina E is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`684 | ~ 2`007 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Carina E has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |