Toyota Aygo 2005 vs Ford KA 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
| Toyota Aygo engine produces 2 HP less power than Ford KA, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Ford KA. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford KA engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Used also on Ford Fiesta | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Ford KA engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller, but higher. Toyota Aygo is 21 cm shorter than the Ford KA, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 186 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
751 litres | 724 litres | |
| Toyota Aygo has 47 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 27 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford KA, which means Toyota Aygo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`160 | 1`265 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Ford KA has
| |