Toyota Aygo 2014 vs Kia Picanto 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 67 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 96 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
| Toyota Aygo engine produces 2 HP more power than Kia Picanto, but torque is 1 NM less than Kia Picanto. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Picanto engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Used also on Hyundai i10 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Kia Picanto engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.46 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
| Toyota Aygo is 14 cm shorter than the Kia Picanto, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 168 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1010 litres | |
|
Kia Picanto has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 87 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia Picanto, which means Toyota Aygo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`240 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Aygo scores higher in safety tests, but Kia Picanto is better rated in child safety tests. The Toyota Aygo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Kia Picanto has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |