Toyota 4-Runner 1995 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 25 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner is larger. Toyota 4-Runner is 35 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 15 cm wider, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1263 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2257 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |