Suzuki Vitara 1997 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 216 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Suzuki Vitara engine produces 29 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 34 NM less than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.1 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Vitara could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 14 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Suzuki Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`805 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Vitara has serious deffects in 445 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |