Suzuki Vitara 1991 vs Lada NIVA (2121) 1980
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 23 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 22 HP more power than Lada NIVA (2121), whereas torque is 16 NM more than Lada NIVA (2121). Thanks to more power Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 13.1 | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Vitara consumes 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lada NIVA (2121), which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 705 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 320 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 380 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Suzuki Vitara is 29 cm longer than the Lada NIVA (2121), 4 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Lada NIVA (2121) has
| |