Suzuki Vitara 1997 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Suzuki Vitara engine produces 25 HP less power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Citroen Xantia | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Vitara is 47 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1300 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 2`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |