Suzuki Vitara 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 117 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 151 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Vitara engine produces 46 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 89 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Vitara consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Suzuki Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Vitara consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
740 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 23 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.18 m | 4.69 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
Suzuki Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Vitara is 52 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Vitara is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Suzuki Vitara has 175 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Vitara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Suzuki Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 2`210 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | low | |
Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 17 800 | 20 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |