Suzuki Splash 2010 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Splash and Suzuki Swift have the same engine power, but Suzuki Splash torque is 4 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Suzuki Splash reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Splash consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Splash could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Splash consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Splash engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Agila | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Suzuki Splash is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Splash is 14 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Splash is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 178 litres | 204 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1050 litres | no data | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage space. Suzuki Splash has 26 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Splash is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Suzuki Splash has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Suzuki Splash, so Suzuki Splash quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Splash has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |