Suzuki SX4 2010 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Suzuki SX4 engine produces 11 HP more power than Toyota Urban Cruiser, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Toyota Urban Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.6 | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki SX4 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki SX4 could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Urban Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Used also on Toyota Yaris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 3.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is larger. Suzuki SX4 is 22 cm longer than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`425 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
| |