Suzuki SX4 2010 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki SX4 engine produces 10 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 164 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Suzuki SX4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki SX4 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki SX4 could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki SX4 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1440 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan Qashqai engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is smaller. Suzuki SX4 is 18 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki SX4 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 388 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Suzuki SX4 has 118 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki SX4 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |