Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Seat Toledo 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Suzuki Liana engine produces 20 HP less power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Seat Toledo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.0 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Liana consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Liana could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Suzuki Liana is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Liana is 9 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.9 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |