Suzuki Jimny 2005 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Jimny engine produces 55 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 240 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Jimny reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 60 litres | |
| 480 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Suzuki Jimny is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Jimny is 58 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 19 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 113 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
324 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Jimny has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Jimny has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |