Suzuki Jimny 2012 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Jimny engine produces 20 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Jimny reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Jimny consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Jimny could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Jimny consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Skoda Yeti engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Suzuki Jimny is smaller. Suzuki Jimny is 55 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Jimny is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 113 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
324 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Suzuki Jimny has 292 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Jimny is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Suzuki Jimny can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`420 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Jimny has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Jimny has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |