Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara and Honda CR-V have the same engine power, but Suzuki Grand Vitara torque is 8 NM less than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Suzuki SX4 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Grand Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 61 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
828 litres | 670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |