Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999 vs Lada NIVA (2121) 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 25 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 64 HP more power than Lada NIVA (2121), whereas torque is 56 NM more than Lada NIVA (2121). | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.7 | |
|
The Lada NIVA (2121) is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lada NIVA (2121), which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 520 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is larger. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 18 cm longer than the Lada NIVA (2121), 10 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
828 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Lada NIVA (2121) has
| |