Suzuki Grand Vitara 2000 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 46 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 54 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Serena, Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 59 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
828 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 200 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 1013 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |