Suzuki Grand Vitara 1998 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 216 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 49 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 98 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.2 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 31 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |