Suzuki Grand Vitara 1998 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 216 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.8 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 49 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 98 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 8.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 31 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 258 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1080 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 152 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 761 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |