Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 10 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Suzuki SX4 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 17 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 398 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1951 litres | 952 litres | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has 127 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 999 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |