Suzuki Grand Vitara 1997 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 33 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.0 | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Serena, Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 42 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 258 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1080 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 152 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |