Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999 vs Honda CR-V 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 - 128 HP | 128 - 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 - 270 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 9.8 | 9.7 - 10.2 | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 61 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 258 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
828 litres | 670 litres | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has 117 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 158 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |