Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 - 163 HP | 140 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 300 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 14.4 seconds | 10.6 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 9.4 | 6.7 - 10.1 | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Suzuki Grand Vitara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 61 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
758 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 343 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 194 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`868 | ~ 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |