Suzuki Alto 2009 vs Suzuki Swift 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 92 HP | |
Torque: | 90 NM | 116 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Alto engine produces 24 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Alto reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 6.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Alto consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Suzuki Alto over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Alto consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 19 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Agila, Suzuki Splash | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.50 m | 3.70 m | |
Width: | 1.60 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.54 m | |
Suzuki Alto is smaller. Suzuki Alto is 20 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Alto is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 129 litres | 198 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
774 litres | 562 litres | |
Suzuki Alto has 69 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Alto (by 212 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Alto is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Suzuki Alto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`250 | 1`485 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 2800 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Alto has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |