Subaru XV 2016 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Subaru XV engine produces 30 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Despite less power, Subaru XV reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Outback, Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Subaru XV is smaller. Subaru XV is 19 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru XV is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1270 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Subaru XV has 245 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 607 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru XV has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |