Subaru XV 2012 vs Jeep Compass 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Subaru XV engine produces 20 HP less power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Jeep Compass. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru XV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru XV consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Subaru XV over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru XV consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 490 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru XV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Compass might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Subaru XV is smaller. Subaru XV is 2 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru XV is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1270 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Subaru XV has 78 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru XV is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jeep Compass, which means Subaru XV can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru XV has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |