Subaru XV 2012 vs Jeep Compass 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Subaru XV engine produces 20 HP less power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Jeep Compass. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru XV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru XV consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Subaru XV over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru XV consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru XV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru XV can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Compass might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.66 m | |
| Subaru XV and Jeep Compass are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 328 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1270 litres | 1269 litres | |
|
Subaru XV has more luggage capacity. Subaru XV has 52 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru XV (by 1 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru XV is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jeep Compass, which means Subaru XV can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru XV scores higher in safety tests, but Jeep Compass is better rated in child safety tests. The Subaru XV scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru XV has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |