Subaru XV 2012 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Subaru XV engine produces 9 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Subaru XV reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru XV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru XV consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Subaru XV over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru XV consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru XV might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru XV is 7 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru XV is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1270 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru XV has 50 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. This could mean that the Subaru XV uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru XV is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru XV is better rated in child safety tests. The Subaru XV scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru XV has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |