Subaru XV 2011 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Subaru XV
2011 - 2016
Mitsubishi ASX
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Subaru XV is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi ASX can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi ASX also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.01.6 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 109 - 150 HP114 - 150 HP
Torque: 150 - 350 NM154 - 360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 - 13.8 seconds10.2 - 13.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.6 - 6.94.6 - 8.1
Subaru XV petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. On average, Subaru XV equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 220 mm (8.7 inches)170 - 195 mm (6.7 - 7.7 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru XV can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.30 m
Width: 1.78 m1.77 m
Height: 1.57 m1.62 m
Subaru XV is larger, but lower.
Subaru XV is 16 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 1 cm wider, while the height of Subaru XV is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres442 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1270 litres1219 litres
Despite its longer length, Subaru XV has 62 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. This could mean that the Subaru XV uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru XV (by 51 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data~ 2`005
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 16 20011 400
Pros and Cons: Subaru XV has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher ground clearance
Mitsubishi ASX has
  • also available in 2WD
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv