Subaru B9 Tribeca 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 (petrol) | 2.4 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 297 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 8.2 - 14.0 | |
|
On average, the Subaru B9 Tribeca petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is 6 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru B9 Tribeca is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2404 litres | |
|
Volvo XC90 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru B9 Tribeca has 80 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. This could mean that the Subaru B9 Tribeca uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru B9 Tribeca is 1.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Subaru B9 Tribeca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 2`737 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |