Subaru B9 Tribeca 2006 vs Nissan Murano 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Subaru B9 Tribeca is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Murano can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 (petrol) | 2.5 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 190 - 255 HP | |
| Torque: | 297 NM | 334 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 8 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 8.0 - 10.6 | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Murano. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru B9 Tribeca and Nissan Murano are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 402 litres | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca has more luggage capacity. Subaru B9 Tribeca has 48 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Murano. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru B9 Tribeca is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Murano, which means Subaru B9 Tribeca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 2`438 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |