Smart ForFour 2004 vs Peugeot 206 2005

 
Smart ForFour
2004 - 2006
Peugeot 206
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 95 HP75 HP
Torque: 125 NM120 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds12.2 seconds
Smart ForFour is more dynamic to drive.
Smart ForFour engine produces 20 HP more power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Peugeot 206. Thanks to more power Smart ForFour reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.86.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Smart ForFour is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Smart ForFour consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that by driving the Smart ForFour over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Smart ForFour consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
970 km on highway1000 km on highway
710 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.75 m3.82 m
Width: 1.68 m1.65 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Smart ForFour is 7 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 3 cm wider, while the height of Smart ForFour is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 268 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
910 litres992 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Smart ForFour has 23 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The Peugeot 206 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 82 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Smart ForFour is 0.6 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Smart ForFour can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4501`450
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Smart ForFour has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Smart ForFour, so Smart ForFour quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 18001400
Pros and Cons: Smart ForFour has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Peugeot 206 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv