Smart ForFour 2004 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.0 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 - 177 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 - 230 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 15.3 seconds | 8.5 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 6.8 | 3.0 - 7.5 | |
|
Smart ForFour petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Lupo. On average, Smart ForFour equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Smart ForFour is larger, but slightly lower. Smart ForFour is 22 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Smart ForFour is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
910 litres | 860 litres | |
|
Smart ForFour has more luggage capacity. Smart ForFour has 138 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Smart ForFour (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForFour is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`450 | ~ 1`368 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForFour has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |